US Coal Exports
Exports Economic Contributions Report
Apr 03 2013

Oregon Affirms Permit for Coal Port Expansion (The World)

Posted in All News, U.S. Ports

State: Port can build cargo slip

 By Gail Elber, The World
COOS BAY — Oregon’s Department of State Lands has affirmed its 2011 decision to grant the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay a removal-fill permit for the proposed Oregon Gateway Marine Terminal at Jordan Cove on Coos Bay’s North Spit.

“This is a victory,” said Port Commission President David Kronsteiner on Wednesday. “The administrative law judge rejected every single argument that Coos Waterkeeper, the Sierra Club and other groups have presented as challenges to this permit.”

The port submitted its application for the marine terminal multi-berth slip in 2007. The state granted the permit in December 2011. In January 2012, however, Coos Waterkeeper, Friends of Living Oregon Waters, Climate Solutions, Greenpeace and the Sierra Club appealed that decision.

The groups said the state acted improperly by not considering the environmental impact of shipping liquefied natural gas and coal from the terminal; that the state should have considered the aquatic impact of building the terminal itself; and that the port hadn’t submitted a complete application.

But in a 374-page decision, Administrative Law Judge Dove Gutman dismissed the groups’ concerns, saying the state had followed the law.

Gutman’s decision said:

  •  The state’s determination that the permit met legal standards “is supported by substantial evidence and is not flawed.”
  •  The proposed upland area where the slip would be created does not contain wetlands and is above the highest high tide line. So the state did not have to consider its impact on the aquatic environment.
  •  The department complied with requirements for permit processing and public review.
  • The permit lawfully authorized construction of the marine terminal and disposal of dredged material at approved stockpile sites.
  •  Oregon law does not require the state to evaluate “the appropriateness of potential users of the terminal or the products ….” The judge said the port had shown that the terminal would be useful even if it weren’t used for shipping coal or LNG.

Representatives of the groups that challenged the permit could not be reached for comment.

The proposed terminal would have an east berth and a west berth, each capable of accommodating large vessels. Jordan Cove Energy Project is seeking federal approval to develop an LNG export facility using the east berth. The port has said the west berth would be available for multiple uses, including potential deployment of deep-sea wind power generation structures as part of the Coos Bay Wind Power Demonstration Project.

The port says development of the Jordan Cove facility would create 2,600 construction jobs. Once operational, the facility would directly employ 180 people at an estimated average annual wage of $81,900, the port says.

See article here.

  • “The fact that we’re no longer in the age of energy scarcity – that we’re in the age of energy abundance – positions the United States in a totally different place. This gives access to affordable, reliable energy in the United States, and gives the U.S. a major competitive advantage.”
    – Dave Banks, Special Assistant to President Donald Trump for International Energy, June 2017
  • “It is in the national interest to promote clean and safe development of our Nation's vast energy resources, while at the same time avoiding regulatory burdens that unnecessarily encumber energy production, constrain economic growth, and prevent job creation. Moreover, the prudent development of these natural resources is essential to ensuring the Nation's geopolitical security.”
    – Executive Order on Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth, March 28, 2017
  • “Historically, U.S. companies seeking to expand their revenues focused first on increasing their number and share of U.S customers. For years, this focus served as a winning strategy for many of the most successful U.S. companies. Today, global economic trends make clear that successful companies are those that reach and sell to consumers outside U.S. borders and around the globe.”
    — 2011 National Export Strategy, U.S. Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee
  • “Federal regulatory agencies should not require climate change studies in the course of their permitting processes for proposed facilities. Coal will be consumed around the world regardless of U.S. trade policy. The only question is whether the coal is produced here in North America, where environmental standards are high, or elsewhere.”
    — U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski, January 7, 2014
  • “At present 19% of the world’s population, 1.3 billion people, lack access to electricity and on New Policy Scenario projections there will still be 1 billion people without such access in 2030. To meet the UN Millennium Development Goal of eradicating extreme poverty by 2015, 395 million more people need access to electricity. There is a strong correlation between electrification and improvement in the United Nations’ Human Development Index.”
    — International Energy Agency, Coal Industry Advisory Board
  • “Access to electricity is strongly correlated with every measurable indicator of human development”
    — Berkeley Science Review, 2008

Count on Coal

National Mining Association

Twitter Logo

facebook Logo