US Coal Exports
Exports Economic Contributions Report
Nov 20 2013

Opposition to Coal Exports Hurts Crow Nation (The Missoulian)

Hear voices of Crow Nation in coal debate

When it comes to developing our energy resources, Montanans have grown accustomed to the federal government getting in the way. But as coal development projects in the state move forward, the latest roadblock is coming from right here in Montana. On a recent visit to the Crow Indian Nation, we learned how local opposition to coal exports is affecting one of the poorest communities in the state.

Some cities along rail routes in Montana are trying to limit coal train traffic, citing concerns about quality of life, traffic congestion and coal dust. At issue are two proposed coal export terminals in Washington that, if approved, would ramp up coal rail shipments from southeastern Montana to the West Coast for export to Asian markets.

Recently, the Missoula City Council passed a resolution asking the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to expand the scope of its environmental review of the Millennium Bulk Terminal in Longview, Wash., more than 500 miles away. The city council wants the agency to consider the impacts of increased coal rail traffic moving through Missoula. City officials in Helena have also expressed similar concerns over the proposed export terminal.

If successful, the economic consequences of Missoula’s resolution – which ultimately aims to prevent Montana coal from ever reaching a western port – are obvious enough. But as we witnessed on our recent trip with several state representatives to the Crow Nation, such restrictions would be a crushing blow to the impoverished tribe.

The Crow Nation has an unemployment rate of almost 50 percent, nearly 10 times higher than the state overall. Yet the tribe sits on one of the largest coal reserves in the nation, estimated at 9 billion tons. The tribe recently received approval to lease 1.4 billion tons to generate a source of long-term revenue. But according to tribal chairman Darrin Old Coyote, this opportunity depends largely on the construction of new export facilities in Washington.

Most of the tribe’s revenues come from coal development, but federal regulations and changing market conditions are making it harder for the tribe’s coal to supply the domestic energy market. In September, the Environmental Protection Agency issued strict limits for new coal-fired power plants, and the agency has more regulations in the works for existing coal plants.

At a September meeting in Missoula between tribal leaders and U.S. Sens. Jon Tester, D-Mont., and Maria Cantwell,

D-Wash., Old Coyote put it simply: “The war on coal is a war on our families and our children.”

Now, the fight against coal is being waged on another front from cities like Missoula. In a letter to Missoula City Council members last month, the tribe urged the city to consider the impacts of their action on the Crow tribe. Restrictions or delays on coal exports would limit their ability to provide jobs, education and other services to its 13,000 members.

“For the Crow people, there are no jobs that compare to a coal job – the wages and benefits exceed anything else that is available,” wrote Old Coyote. “All of this Tribal revenue and employment income will be immediately circulated and multiplied within the economy of southeastern Montana.”

The city has voiced concerns that coal dust from passing trains is harming its residents. But a study conducted last year by the Missoula City-County Health Department found only negligible traces of the dust and determined it was not a significant contributor to local air pollution. And concerns over global emissions neglect an unfortunate reality: If Montana can’t export the coal, other suppliers will.

The voices of the Crow Nation deserve to be heard in this debate. If Missoula and other cities continue to stand in the way of coal exports, they could deny the tribe an opportunity to achieve self-sufficiency and help alleviate poverty. Expanding the scope of an environmental review in Washington to include rail shipments through Montana is unprecedented. The Army Corps denied a similar request from Missoula earlier this year. For the sake of the Crow Nation and the rest of Montana’s vibrant energy industry, the agency would be correct to deny this request as well.

Shawn Regan is a research fellow at the Property and Environment Research Center, a nonprofit research institute in Bozeman. Fred Thomas is a Republican state senator from Stevensville.

See article here.

  • “The fact that we’re no longer in the age of energy scarcity – that we’re in the age of energy abundance – positions the United States in a totally different place. This gives access to affordable, reliable energy in the United States, and gives the U.S. a major competitive advantage.”
    – Dave Banks, Special Assistant to President Donald Trump for International Energy, June 2017
  • “It is in the national interest to promote clean and safe development of our Nation's vast energy resources, while at the same time avoiding regulatory burdens that unnecessarily encumber energy production, constrain economic growth, and prevent job creation. Moreover, the prudent development of these natural resources is essential to ensuring the Nation's geopolitical security.”
    – Executive Order on Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth, March 28, 2017
  • “Historically, U.S. companies seeking to expand their revenues focused first on increasing their number and share of U.S customers. For years, this focus served as a winning strategy for many of the most successful U.S. companies. Today, global economic trends make clear that successful companies are those that reach and sell to consumers outside U.S. borders and around the globe.”
    — 2011 National Export Strategy, U.S. Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee
  • “Federal regulatory agencies should not require climate change studies in the course of their permitting processes for proposed facilities. Coal will be consumed around the world regardless of U.S. trade policy. The only question is whether the coal is produced here in North America, where environmental standards are high, or elsewhere.”
    — U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski, January 7, 2014
  • “At present 19% of the world’s population, 1.3 billion people, lack access to electricity and on New Policy Scenario projections there will still be 1 billion people without such access in 2030. To meet the UN Millennium Development Goal of eradicating extreme poverty by 2015, 395 million more people need access to electricity. There is a strong correlation between electrification and improvement in the United Nations’ Human Development Index.”
    — International Energy Agency, Coal Industry Advisory Board
  • “Access to electricity is strongly correlated with every measurable indicator of human development”
    — Berkeley Science Review, 2008

Count on Coal

National Mining Association

Twitter Logo

facebook Logo