US Coal Exports
Exports Economic Contributions Report
May 27 2014

Coal Export Project Held to Unfair Standards (The Oregonian)

Posted in All News, U.S. Ports

Morrow Pacific coal project has been treated unfairly: Guest opinion

By John Mohlis, Robert Keyser and Don Russell

Oregon’s regulatory and permitting standards were designed to protect our natural landscapes and unique quality of life, while allowing economic development projects that meet our high standards to proceed. Regulators must balance environmental and economic interests, and do so with impartiality, fairness and discipline.

The challenge of maintaining that balance is significant, and we write today to voice concern that it has slipped. Specifically, we have observed an increasingly politicized permitting process for the Morrow Pacific project, a proposed coal export project.

The Morrow Pacific project was designed to minimize impact to the environment and leverage our ports and export and manufacturing sectors by investing in rural counties. The project represents a capital investment of more than $242 million in Oregon, creating more than 2,100 construction jobs and 1,000 operations jobs.

In February of this year the project was granted three permits from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) – a signal that it meets state standards.

As The Oregonian has reported, the permits did not come quickly or easily. Up to a certain point, this is understandable. There are strong emotions surrounding this commodity, with passion both in opposition and support of the project. Permitting processes were structured to accommodate public input, which required time and process. However, at a certain point, regulators have gone too far.

Over the past few years, we have observed DEQ and Department of State Lands (DSL) reversing permitting criteria and establishing expanded state regulatory processes, including steps that impede and even supersede federal permitting processes. Not only are regulators placing an undue burden on the Morrow Pacific project, these decisions risk impacting future projects and port development.

Recent decisions by DSL have effectively moved the goal line by requesting information of the project that falls under the purview of federal agencies. Now, in an arbitrary decision and without advance notice, DSL plans to make a decision by the end of May on a removal/fill permit, without allowing sufficient time for the project to complete federal processes and provide requested information to the state.

DSL Director Mary Abrams was recently quoted in The Oregonian saying, “there are ways to make economic development and good environmental choices at the same time.”

We agree.

Morrow Pacific will achieve that balance while creating good jobs to support families, quality schools and strong communities. Bridging the gap to economic recovery in rural communities is essential to Oregon’s long-term prosperity.

We urge state regulators to be fair, timely and transparent for all projects. Well-designed projects like Morrow Pacific should be allowed to proceed.

John Mohlis is executive secretary of the Oregon State Building and Construction Trades Council, Robert Keyser is president of the Port of St. Helens Commission, and Don Russell is president of the Port of Morrow Commission.

See article here.

  • “The fact that we’re no longer in the age of energy scarcity – that we’re in the age of energy abundance – positions the United States in a totally different place. This gives access to affordable, reliable energy in the United States, and gives the U.S. a major competitive advantage.”
    – Dave Banks, Special Assistant to President Donald Trump for International Energy, June 2017
  • “It is in the national interest to promote clean and safe development of our Nation's vast energy resources, while at the same time avoiding regulatory burdens that unnecessarily encumber energy production, constrain economic growth, and prevent job creation. Moreover, the prudent development of these natural resources is essential to ensuring the Nation's geopolitical security.”
    – Executive Order on Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth, March 28, 2017
  • “Historically, U.S. companies seeking to expand their revenues focused first on increasing their number and share of U.S customers. For years, this focus served as a winning strategy for many of the most successful U.S. companies. Today, global economic trends make clear that successful companies are those that reach and sell to consumers outside U.S. borders and around the globe.”
    — 2011 National Export Strategy, U.S. Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee
  • “Federal regulatory agencies should not require climate change studies in the course of their permitting processes for proposed facilities. Coal will be consumed around the world regardless of U.S. trade policy. The only question is whether the coal is produced here in North America, where environmental standards are high, or elsewhere.”
    — U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski, January 7, 2014
  • “At present 19% of the world’s population, 1.3 billion people, lack access to electricity and on New Policy Scenario projections there will still be 1 billion people without such access in 2030. To meet the UN Millennium Development Goal of eradicating extreme poverty by 2015, 395 million more people need access to electricity. There is a strong correlation between electrification and improvement in the United Nations’ Human Development Index.”
    — International Energy Agency, Coal Industry Advisory Board
  • “Access to electricity is strongly correlated with every measurable indicator of human development”
    — Berkeley Science Review, 2008

Count on Coal

National Mining Association

Twitter Logo

facebook Logo