US Coal Exports
Exports Economic Contributions Report
Sep 09 2014

Wyoming Challenges Oregon Coal Export Permit Decision (Casper Star Tribune)

Posted in All News, U.S. Ports

Wyoming appeals Oregon’s denial of coal port

Wyoming is appealing Oregon’s recent decision to deny an application to build a coal terminal at the Port of Morrow, on the Columbia River.

Wyoming, the nation’s largest coal-producer, has been pressing for access to ports to export coal to Asia, but it has run into stiff opposition in the Northwest.

Gov. Matt Mead said Monday that Oregon’s decision last month to block an application from a subsidiary of Ambre Energy, an Australian company, to build the terminal at the Port of Morrow violates the U.S. Constitution’s Commerce Clause.

“Coal is the fastest-growing fuel source in the world, and this decision by the state of Oregon prevents Wyoming coal producers from competing in that marketplace,” Mead said.

Julie Curtis, communications manager for the Oregon Department of State Lands, said Monday that in addition to Wyoming’s appeal, the agency had received appeals from the Port of Morrow and from Coyote Island Terminal LLC, an Ambre Energy subsidiary. She said more were possible by day’s end.

“We determined that the project as proposed just wasn’t consistent with the protection, conservation and best use of our state’s water resources,” Curtis said.

But Mead charged that the department denied the application for a removal-fill permit to allow placement of pilings in the river because Oregon officials simply dislike coal.

Everett King, president and CEO of Ambre Energy North America, expressed a similar opinion in a statement Monday announcing his company’s appeal.

“The permitting process for a rail-to-barge facility should be project-specific and not influenced by the commodities involved,” King said. “It’s pretty clear the politics of coal overshadowed this process from the beginning.”

Port of Morrow General Manager Gary Neal said the permit denial sets new regulatory precedent that has the risk of curbing future development opportunities.

“We are appealing so that this political decision does not limit economic opportunity in rural Oregon,” he said in a statement.

Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber, a Democrat, has been a vocal opponent of the terminal and voiced his support of the agency’s decision in a statement last month. Kitzhaber said Columbia River Tribes have fundamental rights to fisheries, and projects that affect them should be held to a high standard.

The appeals will move through an administrative review process, Curtis said. She said it’s possible the issue ultimately could wind up at the state court of appeals.

Ambre Energy proposed bringing coal by train to Boardman, Oregon, where it would be loaded on barges at the Port of Morrow and sent more than 200 miles down the Columbia River to the Port of St. Helens. There, it would be transferred to oceangoing ships.

The river is the border between Oregon and Washington.

The application to build the coal terminal aroused fierce public opposition, said Brett VandenHuevel, executive director of Columbia Riverkeeper, a watchdog group that fought against the Ambre terminal permit.

“There’s been an overwhelming concern in opposition about sending coal through Oregon down the Columbia River,” VandenHuevel said. “Twenty-thousand people commented on Ambre’s application alone. There was record-setting attendance at public hearings, thousands of health professionals. I’ve never seen anything like it, how much concern there is about this project.”

The Hood River, Oregon, man said his group and others are concerned with all aspects of the proposal to move coal across Oregon and down the Columbia River and will continue to fight it.

“Oregon complied with the law and concluded that a dirty coal export is too harmful for our river and for our salmon fishery,” VandenHuevel said. “Wyoming’s political efforts aren’t going to change that fact.”

See article here.

  • “The fact that we’re no longer in the age of energy scarcity – that we’re in the age of energy abundance – positions the United States in a totally different place. This gives access to affordable, reliable energy in the United States, and gives the U.S. a major competitive advantage.”
    – Dave Banks, Special Assistant to President Donald Trump for International Energy, June 2017
  • “It is in the national interest to promote clean and safe development of our Nation's vast energy resources, while at the same time avoiding regulatory burdens that unnecessarily encumber energy production, constrain economic growth, and prevent job creation. Moreover, the prudent development of these natural resources is essential to ensuring the Nation's geopolitical security.”
    – Executive Order on Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth, March 28, 2017
  • “Historically, U.S. companies seeking to expand their revenues focused first on increasing their number and share of U.S customers. For years, this focus served as a winning strategy for many of the most successful U.S. companies. Today, global economic trends make clear that successful companies are those that reach and sell to consumers outside U.S. borders and around the globe.”
    — 2011 National Export Strategy, U.S. Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee
  • “Federal regulatory agencies should not require climate change studies in the course of their permitting processes for proposed facilities. Coal will be consumed around the world regardless of U.S. trade policy. The only question is whether the coal is produced here in North America, where environmental standards are high, or elsewhere.”
    — U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski, January 7, 2014
  • “At present 19% of the world’s population, 1.3 billion people, lack access to electricity and on New Policy Scenario projections there will still be 1 billion people without such access in 2030. To meet the UN Millennium Development Goal of eradicating extreme poverty by 2015, 395 million more people need access to electricity. There is a strong correlation between electrification and improvement in the United Nations’ Human Development Index.”
    — International Energy Agency, Coal Industry Advisory Board
  • “Access to electricity is strongly correlated with every measurable indicator of human development”
    — Berkeley Science Review, 2008

Count on Coal

National Mining Association

Twitter Logo

facebook Logo