US Coal Exports
Exports Economic Contributions Report
Feb 22 2015

U.S. Coal Exports Have Bright Future (The Desert Sun)

Is Coal Still Relevant as a Fossil Fuel Export Potential?

By Morris Beschloss, Special to The Desert Sun

Although the U.S. retains the largest coal reserves in the world, along with the top rung in natural gas, and just short of global leadership in oil, coal has become the target of frontal attacks by government agencies such as the EPA, as well as regulatory restraints that relegate this fossil fuel to a fading element of the past, headed for extinction.

The bankruptcy proceedings of Patriot Coal and the weakened position of Peabody would tend to reiterate the fading benefits of this once mighty power generation/industry element.

But a recent report from the National Center for Policy Analysis Research paints a more optimistic picture, despite the hammer blows of the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA has done everything to curtail coal use, down to 38% of existing utility fossil fuels, while retaining most of its benefits of converting iron ore to steel. Additional expansions are prevented from utilizing coal as a powering agent.

The NCPA report derives its increasingly optimistic conclusions from foreign demand for U.S. coal, which this research organization claims is on the rise. NCPA points to increasing demand from India, Japan, and especially China, which relies on coal for over 70% of its growing energy production.

Germany’s imports of American coal have doubled in the recent past. It continues to rise as Berlin attempts to eliminate all use of nuclear power generation by 2022.

The United Kingdom and the Netherlands were the two largest importers of American coal in 2013. American coal exports to Britain were 73% higher in the first three quarters of that year, as compared to the same period in 2012.

While NCPA admits to the greater amount of CO² and greenhouse gas emissions by coal as compared to natural gas and renewables, both undeveloped, developing, and even some European developed nations consider coal’s low cost for power generation a major factor. This, to some of these nations, is more important than “climatological purity.”

In the current seesaw between long-term climatological benefits and lower cost of “steel-making,” as well as heating, cooling, and power generation, coal’s ready availability and cost effectiveness wins out. Even China, which is attempting to “defumigate” its big cities, will still buy coal to supplement its insufficient indigenous resources from lesser climatically stringent exporters, if not the U.S.

At this point of American recovery, it would seem a greater tilt to economic export advantage might be the wiser decision in supporting America’s export revenues, hamstrung by the current “sky-high” dollars, and the potential cutback in oil production.

For future easy access to my blogs, please use the link below, and bookmark it to your desktop. The old link you may be using is still available. However, an alternate link is:

See article here.

  • “The fact that we’re no longer in the age of energy scarcity – that we’re in the age of energy abundance – positions the United States in a totally different place. This gives access to affordable, reliable energy in the United States, and gives the U.S. a major competitive advantage.”
    – Dave Banks, Special Assistant to President Donald Trump for International Energy, June 2017
  • “It is in the national interest to promote clean and safe development of our Nation's vast energy resources, while at the same time avoiding regulatory burdens that unnecessarily encumber energy production, constrain economic growth, and prevent job creation. Moreover, the prudent development of these natural resources is essential to ensuring the Nation's geopolitical security.”
    – Executive Order on Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth, March 28, 2017
  • “Historically, U.S. companies seeking to expand their revenues focused first on increasing their number and share of U.S customers. For years, this focus served as a winning strategy for many of the most successful U.S. companies. Today, global economic trends make clear that successful companies are those that reach and sell to consumers outside U.S. borders and around the globe.”
    — 2011 National Export Strategy, U.S. Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee
  • “Federal regulatory agencies should not require climate change studies in the course of their permitting processes for proposed facilities. Coal will be consumed around the world regardless of U.S. trade policy. The only question is whether the coal is produced here in North America, where environmental standards are high, or elsewhere.”
    — U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski, January 7, 2014
  • “At present 19% of the world’s population, 1.3 billion people, lack access to electricity and on New Policy Scenario projections there will still be 1 billion people without such access in 2030. To meet the UN Millennium Development Goal of eradicating extreme poverty by 2015, 395 million more people need access to electricity. There is a strong correlation between electrification and improvement in the United Nations’ Human Development Index.”
    — International Energy Agency, Coal Industry Advisory Board
  • “Access to electricity is strongly correlated with every measurable indicator of human development”
    — Berkeley Science Review, 2008

Count on Coal

National Mining Association

Twitter Logo

facebook Logo